![]() ![]() I have NOT been impressed with Pianoteq's need for a new model just about every time they release a new instrument. There can be advantage to introducing unready products and following up with "new and improved"Įase of upgrade is MOSTLY a function of the structure of the software's design. The ~$200 price tag is attractive and could be a deciding factor if they catch up (or come close) in some future release. ![]() However Arturia has been producing soft instruments for some time and probably has sufficient resources to catch up and perhaps pass Pianoteq IF they dedicate said resources to it. Having said that, I agree with your opinion that the version of Piano V on you tube seems premature (even primitive) against Pianoteq. Because it's physically modelled I wonder how easy they'll find it to upgrade, something that has been a strong feature with Pianoteq.įirst let me express my appreciation for your fxp contributions, they are among the best I have tried. A lot of the features feels unfinished, like the inability to know how much you've adjusted a setting. It generally sounds low like the sound has been muted. It all seems premature in comparison to Pianoteq. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |